US Senate passes Russian energy sanctions bill
The Senate voted 86–11 for a bill imposing 100% tariffs on buyers of Russian oil and gas. It now moves to the House, where opposition is brewing.
The United States Senate on Friday passed a sweeping sanctions package targeting Russia's energy sector, voting 86–11 to impose 100 percent tariffs on countries that import Russian oil and gas. The legislation, named the “Lindsey O Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026,” is designed to cut off revenue fueling President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine. It now advances to the House of Representatives, where it faces scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans concerned about the scope of executive powers.
What the bill does
The measure sets a 100 percent tariff on purchases of Russian hydrocarbons by major importing nations, significantly escalating economic pressure on Moscow. In addition, it targets clandestine maritime networks that have been used to bypass existing Western embargoes, closing loopholes that have allowed Russia to continue selling oil and gas despite previous sanctions. The bill is named after the late Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina who died on July 11 after spending years advocating for strict action against Russia. A day before his death, Graham and a bipartisan group of senators announced they had secured White House approval to advance the sanctions, which had earlier been blocked by President Donald Trump.

Ukraine and European leaders respond
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed the Senate's action, stating on social media that “real, strong American pressure and sanctions against Russia are what will help the most” to end “this insane Russian war against our independence and our people.” He expressed gratitude to both political parties and the American public for their continued support. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also praised the vote, writing on X: “Together, let us drain Russia's means to continue a war it cannot win.” These reactions underscore the high hopes placed on economic measures to change the trajectory of the conflict.
Bipartisan support, yet concerns remain
The bill's supporters framed it as a decisive tool to force a diplomatic resolution. Senator Jim Risch, the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, said on the Senate floor that the legislation “could finally bring Russia to the negotiating table and end this conflict between Russia and Ukraine.” He argued it would cut “the flow of cash that powers Putin's war machine.” Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen echoed that sentiment, saying the bill sends Putin a message “in the only language he understands: pressure.” Darline Graham Nordone, Graham's sister who now holds his Senate seat, said the bill “hits Putin where it hurts.”
However, opposition is emerging in the House. Democratic Representatives Gregory Meeks and Don Beyer issued a joint press release calling the version adopted by the Senate “unacceptable,” pointing to the risk that the new tariff powers could be used by President Trump without sufficient oversight. Their objections suggest the bill's path through the lower chamber may be complicated. The House is currently in its summer recess, and a vote will not occur until at least early September.

Implications and what's next
The Russian Embassy in Washington had previously condemned the legislation, warning of an impending energy crisis and rising gas prices ahead of the US midterm elections. It argued that sanctioning Russia and its trading partners would be “extremely counterproductive for the United States.” With the bill now pending in the House, the coming weeks are likely to see intense lobbying from all sides. If passed, the measures could significantly reshape global energy trade and increase pressure on Moscow, but the outcome remains uncertain given the political divisions over trade policy and executive authority.